Deshaun Watson, Brown's quarterback, was not accused of any criticism of 10 crimes launched against him;
Kamesha Baker, detective of the Houston Police Department, announced last week that she believed, according to her research and investigation, that Watson was indulged in many crimes.
Charles Robinson, who belongs to Yahoo Sports, has received a copy of the Baker deposition transcript, which is not according to any court order. It was analyzed by him thoroughly.
Three significant points are raised, which are discussed below.
First, the confusion of the image was created due to attorney Rusty Hardin's questioning (as Leah Graham, co-counsel, articulated last week) that the assumption of innocence applicable at trial should also register in the investigative phase. Leah Graham and Rusty Hardin firmly believe that when a woman launches a criminal complaint accusing her of sexual misconduct, the actions of law enforcement should be doubted and distrusted and do not provide comfort and support.
Under Rusty Hardin's and Leah Graham's view of the system, imagine how things would go when a woman launches a criminal complaint of sexual misconduct. "Sorry, ma'am, but we are required to assume that the accused is innocent, so you'd better have anything more considerable than your own story of what happened."
That is not only how it works. Yes, it's for the police to create a fundamental reliability assessment of the accuser. That is the part of what the police are taught to follow. And if the person making the complaint looks reliable to those with experience and skill in such matters, that's enough to further the procedure.
What are the police going to do if the suspect selects to avail his constitutional right to carry on peace? Will they leave the case?
No, that creates irrelevancy. But it creates a lot of sense that Leah Graham and Rusty Hardin (and Watson) would require it that way. It gives the direct way to their requests that Watson has done nothing wrong.
Second, Detective Kamesha Baker's evidence concentrated at times on the difference between permission and enforcement. Kamesha Baker raised objections that the numerous facts about Watson's height and size differences, and the women he has appointed on Instagram to provide him with private massages, make it tough to obtain consent. Any sexual activity that has taken place may impact an evident concern about what would happen if the massage therapist rejected Watson's attempt to shift the focus to sexual intercourse rather than massage.
Third, must return the cases against Watson to every woman's words because that is how the massage session was designed. Apparently, Watson wanted these massage to move ahead.
Only two people were in the room. No one else was there. There was never proof to confirm any of the participant's versions.
Watson shouldn't have been protected by the non-disclosure agreement provided by the Texans' Director of Security if he was really just looking for a massage. This would be the third person who could break the tie if the massage therapist later claimed something wrong had happened.
The conditions he has created inevitably result in the cases boiling of one person speaking against another. And Rusty Harden, as part of his attempt to prove that all 24 (rapidly to be 26 and eventually can be raised) women are lying, suggests that the police - and everyone else - should only assume that they are.
That is the reason the raw number of allegations becomes convincing and relevant. Suppose it would be fine if there were only one person. But when it's around 24 or 26 and more, all of whom are basically discussing the same story of a massage that went in a different direction, Watson's credibility over these discussions about never insulting, never attacking, and never attempting something inappropriate becomes challenging to agree now. Especially two weeks ago when considering Rusty Hardin's declaration that there's no crime in receiving a "happy ending" or in making an effort.
All these cases against Watson stem from his accused attempt to turn massage into sexual activity. All but three were rejected. The three declared that there was no implied consent.
Ignoring the raw number is not possible. If, as Rusty Hardin and Leah Graham believe, all these matters are unnecessarily baseless and provoked by a Pied Piper only to gain significance and pay, then the foundation will have some cracks. Last year, eighteen plaintiffs were willing to receive $ 100,000 each (before expenses and fees). They did not. According to common sense, at least one of them would be furious for the cause of money she thought she was receiving last year if it was really about letting the cash out from Watson.
Rusty Hardin and Leah Graham may object that Buzbee has kept the plaintiffs together with the agreement that later they will receive excessively. Again, common sense tells us that if this was a big ploy aimed at spotting Watson for "extraction" or any other term he used to describe the cases, someone would have been out of their rows or would have spoken out of turn. Instead, the rows keep forming - and the plaintiffs stick together.
If they are not, and if Leah Graham and Rusty Harden want the league, the audience, the media, and eventually the jury to know, then they have to collect evidence for this effect and make it familiar to those in a position to communicate to the world. Instead, the only thing circulating is the raw number of pending cases launched on Watson.
Either he is the victim of unparalleled witchcraft opposing a known and wealthy pro athlete, or he is a hunter. There is no middle ground at the
Login To Leave a Comment